Political Cults: NATLFED


I was involved with a variety of organizations on the radical left for close to fifteen years. Some were genuinely enjoyable (working with a radical press) others less so (attending meetings at the “revolutionary collective”). But the craziest experience, one that led me to challenge the alphabet soup of revolutionary organizations in the U.S. (what Ron Radosh terms the “leftover left”), was my time spent volunteering with a front group of the National Labor Federation.

The front group, or “entity” in cult jargon, will remain nameless. Like so many San Francisco Bay Area radical sects, they promoted an ultra-left, anti-imperialist line. What made them stand out was the services they provided in the community including food and clothing distributions and medical care. As a young urban radical, dedicated to the struggle for social justice™ and eager to work with a local, community-based organization, I called a number in their newspaper and arranged to meet with representatives of the organization. We met at their office. They talked about their projects (many), their need for volunteers (great), and the possibilities for organizing in Oakland (endless). What they failed to mention was this was not an independent organization, it was part of a larger group called the National Federation of Labor (NATLFED), a group that I later found out was a political cult.

At my first meeting they claimed the organization was independent and community supported. I wondered how they could pay for an office, publish a newspaper, and pay their staff? Did they get government grants? They said they refused government funding and all of the people in the organization were volunteers. Then they slowly let you know the organization is part of a larger organization of “strata-organizing entities” seeking to “organize the unorganized.”

Entities? Strata-organizing? WTF? If it sounds strange, it is. The organization operates with a vocabulary laden with acronyms and arcane terminology. Here are some examples from The Essential Organizer, NATLFEDs bible:

benefits program: Claimed program or programs for organizing people as members and providing them with medical, dental, legal, food, and clothing.

blue-sky briefing: Meeting held in an open field to avoid feared electronic eavesdropping.

cadre: A committed, Provisional Communist Party-dedicated member of the cult. “A cadre’s life goal and the organization’s goal are the same. A cadre’s lifestyle is the same as the organization lifestyle.” — The Essential Organizer

canvassing: A term common to all political groups for soliciting support. NATLFED canvassing is unique in its strident demands on front volunteers and cult members to canvass, and for the strident tone of canvassers toward potential donors. NATLFED canvassing can be door-to-door, or it can be street tabling — if the latter, often in front of banks and supermarkets.

Central Committee: Governing body of the Provisional Communist Party.

constitution: Putatively governing document of the cult. The Essential Organizer actually has more day-to-day relevance. The constitution includes a death penalty and says that you may criticize and leave the organization only within your first year, after which either is forbidden.

DOT: The time a NATLFED member has been committed to the inner organization, as distinct from the time the person was simply volunteering.

entity: A front of the national organization. Entities solicit resources for themselves and for the national organization, and recruit volunteers into cult membership. Publicly called a mutual benefit association.

The Essential Organizer: The secret, micromanaging organizational manual of NATLFED.

FIIN: Financial input, a form or system for managing expenses and income. Also a technique to raise money: “A FIIN tactic.”

FOP: Friend of the Party. Aware of the Provisional Communist Party and in agreement with its politics, but not ready to join.

member: NATLFED calls “member” someone who signs up to be part of a mutual benefit organization. Such “members” are little involved: they still have normal lives and are barely indoctrinated with the public goal of the group (to organize without revolution), never mind the secret goal (to organize with revolution). Cult watchers would call “members” people who accept the secret goal of the group and have structured their lives around it. NATLFED calls such people cadre.

mutual benefit organization: Public name for a recruiting entity. MBAs claim to be unionlike groups offering benefits to the needy in exchange for membership of $0.62 a month (said to be the average wage of a farm worker in the early 1970s). MBAs beg donations of cash or supplies from local residents and businesses. The needy receive negligible aid, however, and when they do get aid they are expected to return the favor with exhausting support of the MBA. Most resources are kept by the organization. When aid is given, it is to maintain the illusion of MBAs as charitable to the poor, or to propagandize, as in free mass Thanksgiving or Christmas dinners followed by lectures about strata organizing.

National Labor Federation: the network of local entities. NATLFED is a fraction of the Provisional Communist Party, the central, controlling core of the cult.

NOC: East Coast base of national operations for NATLFED. Pronounced “knock”; stands for “National Office Central.” Located in Brooklyn. Often called the Cave in press reports, but “cave” is a police term for any suspected group’s headquarters, and reporters have talked more to police more than to cult members. One room of NOC is indeed called the Cave, though. See also COSHAAD.

OPS: Operations manager. Also synonym for “operations” in general.

propaganda: “Information released at a time or a manner to sustain, create, or enforce an effect. Example: for us to write in the newsletter nice things about reformist groups is propaganda, because by doing it we hope that the reformists realize we are willing to talk to at least establish polemics . . . even if they are ignorant, self- serving assholes . . . or think we are, whatever the current dialectic of position may be.” — The Essential Organizer.

Provisional Communist Party: The core of the cult. Centrally governs all branches of the greater organization, of which NATLFED is its largest and most active fraction. Only committed, viable party members are officers of an entity, but volunteers of an entity may know nothing of the Party or even of NATLFED. Also known as the Communist Party of the U.S.A, Provisional; Provisional Party of Communists, the Formation, etc.

The front groups do not let you know anything about their connection with NATLFED when you walk in the door. Nor is NATLFED mentioned on any of their literature. Over time, they let volunteers know a little here and there and start to lay on a heavy pressuring technique along the lines of, “the world is going to hell and unless you become a full-time volunteer (cadre) it will only get worse!” For stubborn people like me, the more they laid it on, the less I volunteered. When I stopped completely they would call me three or four times a week but eventually cut back to calling once a week, then once a month, then they gave up. Others were sucked right in by this badgering. I met more than a few people who basically admitted, “yeah, they are crazy but they are doing really good work in the community.”

Reflecting on my experiences with radical groups in the U.S. I began to wonder, why do people get involved with political organizations that are so far on the margins? Do they believe the far-out goals of these groups will ever be attained? Or do they join for the sense of belonging and identity these groups provide? I think the latter plays a much larger role than most recognize.

[Read the FBI files on NATLFED and LARGO, a related group]


[Logo of the National Equal Justice Association, or, NEJA. The organization’s money laundering wing or entity in cult jargon.]

Part II: Inside NATLFED (coming soon)

7 responses »

  1. Fascinating stuff TNC. Like you, my eyes would glaze over when activists within front groups I was once part of started to lay the party program on thick. Regardless of the good work an organization may do, it will end up going nowhere if it is just a vehicle to secretly recruit members to a party.

    Looking back, I find it shocking how cultish a lot of far left groups were that I encountered. The Sparticists and RCP were just too examples of the litany of groups that require a religious devotion from their adherents.

    I remember my first encounter with some LaRouche supporters, and thinking that they seemed normal and balanced. Oh how wrong that initial assessment was!

  2. Back in my rad lefty days I could not figure out whether NATLFED was:

    (a) a political cult
    (b) a COINTEPRO-type group
    (c) some combination of (a) and (b)

    I leaned more toward (b) back then. I thought, “maybe this organization was created by the FBI (or some other government outfit) to discredit the ‘real’ radical left.”

    Now days I realize the radical left does not need an elaborate scheme like this to discredit them. They do it to themselves.

    The Wiki list seems accurate to me. I am only familiar with the entities in CA and NY though. I know they table at colleges and universities in both states.

    I read that the LaRouche organization and NATFLED were cooperating at some point. I think in the late 1970s or early 1980s. But don’t quote me on that.

  3. The LaRouche bit is correct. There was a great article about the organization in the Public Eye back in 1984, but the info is still pretty good background on the group and its various networks.


    Since finding out this group I worked with was a front for NATLFED, I have been rethinking all the hours I put in and pointless things they had me doing. At the time I thought it was all part of community organizing; the unglamorous parts necessary to keep an org going. But reading through the various accounts as to how this group pulls people in, guilts them into spending all waking hours with them, and then breaking them through endless amounts of pointless work, I have a very different look back at all of it.

    I’m thankful I was only with them for a few months. Reading some of the stories from folks who were members for years is rather depressing.

  4. Thanks for the link to the Public Eye article. I recall reading it quite a few years ago.

    Regarding the volume of unending and meaningless work, I was always weary of the amount of time they spent creating/updating files on volunteers. All of this info. was recorded on typed index cards. They said they did not use computer programs like Access for “security reasons” which always seemed like a b.s. excuse to me.

    When I stopped volunteering I had all sorts of crazy ideas about why they were collecting this information. Maybe they turned it over to the government? This is was my mindset at the time.

    The development/proliferation of Internet access made researching the organization much easier. The more accounts (in Public eye and elsewhere) that I read the more convinced I became of NATLFEDs cult status.

    Like yourself, I also reflected back on my experiences, especially my interactions with cadre. While not quite glassy-eyed and glazed over, they all were a bit “off” in their own way. They were committed for sure, but they also seemed almost beaten down, psychically and mentally.

    Yes, the stories from ex-cadre are very depressing. I’m glad I never did more than volunteer for a short period of time. That was enough for me.

  5. Pingback: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to be Tried in NYC, Lynne Stewart Off to Jail and Other News « The New Centrist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s